Growth Scenario of New Zealand-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Questions: 1.Bloxham claimed that New Zealand was the fastest growing of the 34 OECD economies in the last year. State the latest annual growth rate available for New Zealand and Australia and work out how many years it would take for New Zealands per capita GDP to overtake that of Australias? 2.New Zealand is considered a rock star Economy. Using the Income Accounting identity explain which sectors have performed well. 3.The Closer Economic Relations (CER) deal signed by Australia and New Zealand is considered a key element of which type of Economic Policy Consensus? 4.Explain the effects of the mining boom on the Australian Economy. Answers: 1.New Zealand, one of the members of the OECD countries, has been experiencing impressive economic growth in the recent periods. The growth rate of GDP of this country has increased from 2.5% (2015) to 3.1% (2016), with the GDP rising to USD 182 billion (2016) from USD 173 billion (2015). The per capita GDP of the country also showed substantial growth from $37,294 in 2015 to $38,320 in 2016 (Dailytelegraph.com.au, 2017). On the other hand, Australia has remained a consistent performer in economic growth scenario. The countrys GDP has increased from 1,230 billion dollars in 2015, to 1,260 billion dollars in 2016. However, the growth rate of GDP has slowed in the current years from 2.4% (2015) to only 2.5% (2016). The per capita GDP has increased from 51,363 USD in 2015 to 51,878 USD in 2016 (Data.worldbank.org, 2017). The growth rate of per capita GDP for the two countries can be calculated by using the following formula (Pitt.edu, 2017): Growth Rate of per capita GDP = GDP per capita of Year (2015) GDP per capita of Year (2016) Therefore, the growth rate of GDP per capita of New Zealand, = (38,32037,294) -1 = 0.027 = 0.03 (3% Approx) The growth rate of GDP per capita of Australia, = (51,878-51,363) -1 = 0.01 (1% Approx) To calculate the period of time both the countries will take to double the growth rates of per capita GDP, the Rule of 70 can be used. However, this formula cannot show the time period New Zealand will take to over-take the per capita GDP of Australia. To calculate that, the following method can be used (Pitt.edu, 2017): Future Value (FV) of GDP per capita = Current Value of GDP per capita (1+ GR)n [Where, GR = Current Growth Rate of GDP per capita and n = Number of years in future] Using the above formula the following statistics can be noticed for both the countries: FV for New Zealand = 38,320*(1+0.03)n FV for Australia= 51,878*(1+0.01)n n Australia New Zealand 15 60,228 59,701 20 63,301 69,210 Therefore, it can be concluded from the above growth statistics that New Zealand will over-take the per capita GDP of Australia within fifteen to twenty years from the current time. 2.Over the recent years, New Zealand has shown an impressive growth in its economy, with the growth rate of GDP being 3.1% in 2016, which is more than almost majority of the OECD countries. This growth is a cumulative effect of the growths in different sectors of the economy, which can be studied with the help of the National Income Accounting Method (Johnson and Noguera 2012): The components of GDP of a country at a particular point of time are as follows: C Private Consumption Expenditure in the economy I Private Investment Expenditure in the economy G Public or Government Expenditure (Both Public Consumption and Investment are included this component) NX Net Exports (Exports Imports) Mathematically, GDP = C + I + G + NX [National Income Accounting Equation (Cooper, Edey and Peacock 2013)] The sector wise growth scenario of New Zealand is discussed below: C- In the recent period, the nominal value of the private consumption expenditures has not increased considerably in the country. However, the real value of consumption has increased comparatively at a higher rate. This implies that the consumption pattern has not changed substantially in the country (Fairburn 2013). I- During recession, the private investment expenditures in the country, fell considerably, to 15.1% of the Real GDP of the country. However, post recession the investment expenditures gained pace and investment consists of 18.7% of the Real GDP of New Zealand in the recent years (Downes, Hanslow and Tulip 2014). G- Compared to the private consumption expenditures, the public consumption expenditures expanded at a much higher rate in the country, indicating a major change in the pattern of public consumption over the years. However, the public investment did not show any impressive growth, in the current period; it consists of 21% of Real GDP of the country, which is lower than 21.6%, the average for the last two decades (Parkyn and Vehbi 2014) . NX- The trade sector of New Zealand improved largely after the country experienced Liberalization in the external sector, facilitating easy exports and imports. Post 1980s, the country saw huge increase in the both the quantities of exports and imports. However, the increase in the volume of imports was much higher than the increase in the volume of exports, indicating that the country gained capability of importing more goods and services (especially technological innovations) (Fabling and Sanderson 2015). From the above discussion, it is evident barring the private consumption expenditures and the public government expenditures, all other components of the GDP of New Zealand increased impressively in the recent years, contributing significantly to its huge economic growth and making it one of the fastest growing economies among the thirty-four OECD countries. 3.One of the most significant economic phenomena, witnessed by both Australia and New Zealand, which contributed significantly in shaping up the economy of both the countries and became one of the major reasons of their current prosperity, is the Closer Economic Relations (CER), which came into force in 1983. The CER was mainly a free trade agreement between both the countries, one of the most successful one of its kind (News.com.au, 2017). Under this agreement, the main policies taken were elimination of all types of price and non-price quotas, tariffs and any other trade restrictions that were present between the two countries, which were creating impediments on path of their economic growth (Kelsey 2015). The main objective behind this step was economic integration of two leading global economies and creation of a Single Economic Market, which implied that all the goods and services that can be bought in one of these two countries would also be available in the other country. Unde r this agreement, the residents of both New Zealand and Australia were enabled to move, work and live in any of these countries freely, which facilitated two way trades and employment significantly (Leslie and Elijah 2012). Due to this agreement, both the countries experienced significant growth their market shares in the global scenario, leading to a growth in their economy. With the advent of CER, many Australian entrepreneurs migrated to New Zealand and prospered hugely with time. The same also happened for entrepreneurs of New Zealand. The symbiotic growth relationships resulted in a more than eight to nine per cent growth of economy of both the countries (Kelsey 2015). New Zealand was specifically benefitted due to this agreement of free trade. Due to the creation of the Single Economic Market, it became immensely easy for businessmen of New Zealand to expand their business to Australia, thereby creating a huge exposure for their products and services, providing them a market almost the size of Queensland. Australia, on the other hand, became one of the biggest sources of the countrys FDI (Fairburn 2013). The economy of New Zealand prospered both ways, by gaining huge Australian markets and by draw ing huge investments from the country, contributing to the GDP of New Zealand. Therefore, CER is evidently one of the primary contributors in the fast and impressive economic growth of New Zealand in the recent periods (News.com.au, 2017). 4.Australia experienced a mining boom of enormous magnitude at around 2003, which was a result of a sudden upsurge in the demand of ores, especially iron ores, in the global market and specifically in China and some other Asian countries. This huge demand hike, increased the price of the goods, especially iron ores and the country experienced more than three times increase in the price of the iron ores that they produced in large quantities, within a decade (Downes, Hanslow and Tulip 2014). Like CER, the mining boom another significant phenomenon, this contributed substantially, in shaping up the economy of the country. The mining boom in Australia, not only raised the GDP and the GDP growth rate of the country, but also significantly contributed in raising the standard of living of the citizens as a whole. The main beneficiaries of this economic boom were the giants in the mining industry. However, the benefits also hugely percolated to the working class, who saw a massive increase in their nominal as well as real wages, employment and over all lifestyle. The private investment in the mining sector, increased from 2% to 8% during this period as more and more companies ventured in the industry (Langton and Longbottom 2012). The effects of the boom in the mining industry in Australia withered away in the recent period. The primary reason behind this was a massive fall, in the demand as well as price of the iron ores, the country exported, in the international market. This, as a result, lead to a tremendous downsizing of the overall budget of the country (Downes, Hanslow and Tulip 2014). Over the years, due to the boom in the mining sector, this sector remained a major contributor in the countrys GDP and the country over-emphasized on this sector, with increasing investment on mining, sometimes at the cost of drawing resources from other sectors, which had potentials to prosper. Therefore, with the downsizing of the mining sector, the economic growth of the country experienced an overall slowdown (Langton and Longbottom 2012 References Cooper, R., Edey, H.C. and Peacock, A.T., 2013.National income and social accounting. Routledge. Dailytelegraph.com.au (2017).The Kiwis are on our economic tails. [online] Dailytelegraph.com.au. Available at: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/business/jessica-irvine/new-zealand-is-kicking-australias-economy/news- story/cdce93e5511f96f9b45a3406ddef4805 [Accessed 17 Aug. 2017]. Data.worldbank.org (2017).Countries | Data. [online] Data.worldbank.org. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/country/ [Accessed 16 Aug. 2017]. Downes, P.M., Hanslow, K. and Tulip, P., 2014. The effect of the mining boom on the Australian economy. Fabling, R. and Sanderson, L., 2015. Export Performance, Invoice Currency and Heterogeneous Exchange Rate Pass?through.The World Economy,38(2), pp.315-339. Fairburn, M., 2013.The ideal society and its enemies: Foundations of modern New Zealand society, 1850-1900. Auckland University Press. Johnson, R.C. and Noguera, G., 2012. Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added.Journal of international Economics,86(2), pp.224-236. Kelsey, J., 2015.Reclaiming the future: New Zealand and the global economy. Bridget Williams Books. Kelsey, J., 2015.The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment?. Bridget Williams Books. Langton, M. and Longbottom, J. eds., 2012.Community futures, legal architecture: foundations for Indigenous peoples in the global mining boom. Routledge. Leslie, J. and Elijah, A., 2012. Does N= 2? Trans?Tasman Economic Integration as a Comparator for the Single European Market.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,50(6), pp.975-993. News.com.au (2017).Three things that make New Zealand better than Australia. [online] NewsComAu. Available at: https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/three-things-that-make-new-zealand-better/news-story/efb745fbae40c0dd14e444cdeb60b3fd [Accessed 16 Aug. 2017]. Parkyn, O. and Vehbi, T., 2014. The effects of fiscal policy in New Zealand: Evidence from a VAR model with debt constraints.Economic Record,90(290), pp.345-364. Pitt.edu (2017).Bernanke - Chap. 8 -- Economic Growth. [online] Pitt.edu. Available at: https://www.pitt.edu/~mgahagan/Bern8.htm [Accessed 16 Aug. 2017]